logo
search
News

Concentric vs. Eccentric Butterfly Valves

iconJRVAL

iconAug 09 2025

 

Concentric vs. Eccentric Butterfly Valves

An exhaustive engineering archive dedicated to the design principles, classifications, applications, and technical specifications of concentric and eccentric butterfly valves. This document serves as a high-fidelity resource for engineers, designers, and procurement specialists.

Article Paths

From News: HOME NEWS Concentric vs. Eccentric Butterfly Valves
From BFV Hub: HOME BFV HUB Concentric vs. Eccentric Butterfly Valves

1.0 Foundational Principles & Core Classifications

The primary distinction between butterfly valve types lies in the geometric relationship between the disc, stem, and seat. This geometry dictates the valve's sealing mechanism, performance characteristics, operational lifespan, and suitability for various industrial applications. Understanding these core concepts is essential for proper valve selection.

Concentric (Zero Offset)

Also known as a center-lined or resilient-seated butterfly valve, this is the most basic design. The stem passes through the centerline of the disc, which is also the centerline of the valve body. Sealing is achieved by the disc compressing against a soft, elastomeric or polymer seat.

Sealing Principle: Interference Fit & Compression

Eccentric (Offset)

In an eccentric design, the stem is offset from the centerline of the disc and/or the valve body. This geometry creates a cam-like action, moving the disc out of contact with the seat upon opening. This design can be single, double, or triple offset, with each providing progressively lower friction and better performance in demanding services.

Sealing Principle: Torque-Energized & Positional Sealing

2.0 The Concentric (Zero Offset) Butterfly Valve

Design, Performance, and Applications

The concentric design relies on the flexibility and resilience of its soft seat. As the valve closes, the edge of the disc sinks into the seat, creating a large-area, bubble-tight seal. This constant contact, however, is both its strength and weakness. It ensures excellent sealing in low-pressure applications but also leads to friction and seat wear over time, limiting its use in throttling or high-cycle services. Its simple construction makes it a cost-effective choice for general purpose and utility lines.

Performance Characteristics

Primarily suited for on/off services where tight shut-off is critical.

Key Attributes:
Excellent bidirectional, bubble-tight sealing.
Low cost and simple, compact design.
High friction between disc and seat during operation.
Limited by temperature and pressure ratings of the soft seat material.
Not suitable for abrasive or corrosive media.

Typical Application Areas

Ideal for low-pressure, clean fluid applications.

Common Industries:
Water & Wastewater Treatment
HVAC & District Cooling/Heating
Food & Beverage Processing
Fire Protection Systems
Low-pressure Chemical Services

Exhaustive Data: API 609 Cat. A / EN 593 Resilient-Seated Valves

NPS (inch) DN (mm) Face-to-Face (API 609 Cat. A, mm) Face-to-Face (EN 558 S20, mm) Pressure Rating (Wafer/Lug) Common Body Mat. Common Disc Mat. Common Seat Mat. Temp. Range (°C) Approx. Weight (kg)
2 50 43 43 Class 150 / PN16 Ductile Iron SS316 EPDM -30 to 120 4
3 80 46 46 Class 150 / PN16 Ductile Iron SS316 EPDM -30 to 120 6
4 100 52 52 Class 150 / PN16 Ductile Iron SS316 NBR -10 to 80 9
6 150 56 56 Class 150 / PN16 Ductile Iron Al-Bronze NBR -10 to 80 15
8 200 60 60 Class 150 / PN16 Cast Iron SS316 Viton (FKM) -20 to 200 25
10 250 68 68 Class 150 / PN16 WCB SS316 PTFE -30 to 200 40
12 300 78 78 Class 150 / PN16 WCB Duplex SS EPDM -30 to 120 58
14 350 78 78 Class 150 / PN10 Ductile Iron SS316 EPDM -30 to 120 85
16 400 102 102 Class 150 / PN10 Ductile Iron SS316 EPDM -30 to 120 115
20 500 127 127 Class 150 / PN10 Ductile Iron SS316 EPDM -30 to 120 210
24 600 154 154 Class 150 / PN10 Ductile Iron SS316 EPDM -30 to 120 320
36 900 203 203 PN10 Ductile Iron SS316 EPDM -30 to 120 850
48 1200 254 254 PN10 Ductile Iron SS316 EPDM -30 to 120 1700

3.0 The Eccentric (Offset) Butterfly Valve

Eccentric butterfly valves were engineered to overcome the limitations of the concentric design. By introducing one or more offsets to the stem's position, the disc is able to lift off the seat in a "cam" or "quarter-turn elliptical" motion. This drastically reduces friction, minimizes wear, and allows for the use of more robust sealing materials, including metal, for high-pressure and high-temperature applications.

Double Offset (High-Performance)

The workhorse of process industries. The stem is offset from both the disc centerline and the valve centerline. This geometry ensures the seal only makes contact during the final few degrees of closing, virtually eliminating friction during the 90° rotation and extending valve life significantly.

Offsets:
1st: Stem axis is behind the seat axis.
2nd: Stem axis is offset from the pipe centerline.

Triple Offset (TOV)

The ultimate solution for critical and severe service applications. It adds a third offset: the seat cone axis is angled relative to the valve centerline. This creates a friction-free, torque-seated metal-to-metal seal. The result is a bubble-tight, zero-leakage valve capable of handling extreme pressures, temperatures, and cryogenic conditions.

Offsets:
1st & 2nd: Same as Double Offset design.
3rd: Seat cone axis is offset from the valve centerline.

Single Offset

A less common design where the stem is offset only from the disc's centerline. It was an early attempt to reduce seat wear but has been largely superseded by the superior performance of double and triple offset designs. It is typically found in legacy systems or specialized, niche applications.

Offsets:
1st: Stem axis is behind the seat axis.
2nd: No second offset.

Exhaustive Data: API 609 Cat. B (Double Offset / HPBV)

NPS DN Class 150 F-F (mm) Class 300 F-F (mm) Class 600 F-F (mm) Body Material Disc Material Seat Material Pressure Class Bolt Qty (Cl 300) Bolt Size (Cl 300) Approx. Weight (kg, Cl 300)
3 80 114 127 165 WCB SS316 RPTFE 150-600 8 3/4" 18
4 100 108 140 191 WCB SS316 RPTFE 150-600 8 3/4" 25
6 150 127 152 241 CF8M CF8M TFM 1600 150-600 12 7/8" 45
8 200 140 165 292 CF8M CF8M RPTFE 150-600 12 1" 75
10 250 152 178 330 WCB SS316 RPTFE 150-600 16 1 1/8" 120
12 300 165 191 356 WCB SS316 RPTFE 150-600 16 1 1/4" 180
16 400 191 216 432 WCB SS316 RPTFE 150-600 20 1 3/8" 350
20 500 216 241 508 WCB SS316 RPTFE 150-600 24 1 1/2" 580
24 600 241 267 559 WCB SS316 RPTFE 150-600 24 1 5/8" 900
30 750 267 318 660 WCB SS316 RPTFE 150-600 28 1 3/4" 1600
36 900 318 368 711 WCB SS316 RPTFE 150-600 32 2" 2500
42 1050 356 406 838 WCB SS316 RPTFE 150-600 36 2" 3800
48 1200 394 457 914 WCB SS316 RPTFE 150-600 44 2" 5200

Exhaustive Data: API 609 Cat. B (Triple Offset / TOV)

NPS DN Class 150 F-F (mm) Class 300 F-F (mm) Class 600 F-F (mm) Class 900 F-F (mm) Body Material Disc Material Seal Material Temp. Range (°C) Approx. Weight (kg, Cl 600)
3 80 114 127 165 210 A216 WCB A351 CF8M SS316+Graphite -196 to 650 28
4 100 108 140 191 216 A216 WCB A351 CF8M SS316+Graphite -196 to 650 40
6 150 127 152 241 292 A351 CF8M A351 CF8M SS316+Graphite -196 to 650 70
8 200 140 165 292 330 A351 CF8M A351 CF8M SS316+Graphite -196 to 650 110
10 250 152 178 330 368 A216 WCB A351 CF8M SS316+Graphite -196 to 650 190
12 300 165 191 356 400 A216 WCB A351 CF8M SS316+Graphite -196 to 650 280
16 400 191 216 432 489 A216 WCB A351 CF8M SS316+Graphite -196 to 650 550
24 600 241 267 559 610 A216 WCB A351 CF8M SS316+Graphite -196 to 650 1400
36 900 318 368 711 775 A216 WCB A351 CF8M SS316+Graphite -196 to 550 3200
42 1050 356 406 838 902 A216 WCB A351 CF8M SS316+Graphite -196 to 550 4800
60 1500 457 559 1092 1181 A216 WCB A351 CF8M SS316+Graphite -196 to 550 9500
80 2000 - - 1397 1505 Fabricated CS Fabricated SS SS316+Graphite -29 to 450 18000

*Note on DN2000 (80 inch) data: Face-to-face dimensions and weights for valves of this magnitude are not standardized and fall outside the scope of published ASME B16.10 / API 609 tables. The values provided are based on engineering principles and common industry practice for large-diameter fabricated valves. These figures are for reference only and must be confirmed by the manufacturer during the final design and engineering phase.

4.0 Comparative Analysis & Selection Guide

Choosing the correct butterfly valve requires a systematic evaluation of the application's demands against the capabilities of each design type. This matrix provides a direct comparison across key engineering factors to guide the selection process.

Sealing Performance

Sealing mechanism and reliability are primary differentiators.
Concentric

Bubble-tight bi-directional seal via soft seat compression. Excellent for general service but prone to wear.

Double Offset

Low-friction cam action. Excellent sealing with soft or metal seats. Bi-directional, but may have a preferred flow direction for optimal performance.

Triple Offset

Friction-free, torque-seated metal-to-metal cone sealing. Provides true zero-leakage, bi-directional shut-off, even in severe service.

Pressure & Temperature Range

The operating envelope is largely defined by the valve's design and materials.
Concentric

Low pressure (up to PN16/Class 150) and limited temperature (typically -30°C to 200°C) dictated by the elastomer seat.

Double Offset

Medium pressure/temperature. Can handle up to PN100/Class 600 and temperatures from cryogenic to ~450°C, depending on seat/body materials.

Triple Offset

High pressure/temperature. Designed for PN160/Class 900+ and extreme temperatures from cryogenic (-196°C) to over 650°C.

Service Life & Durability

Friction is the primary enemy of valve longevity.
Concentric

Lower lifespan, especially in high-cycle or throttling applications due to constant seat friction and wear.

Double Offset

Significantly longer lifespan due to reduced friction. Seat is more protected and durable.

Triple Offset

Highest durability and longest service life. The friction-free design and robust all-metal construction resist wear and thermal cycling.

Application & Cost

The final decision often balances performance requirements with budget.
Concentric

Low Cost. Best for utilities, water, HVAC, and general on-off duties where conditions are not demanding.

Double Offset

Medium Cost. The standard for process industries: chemical, oil & gas (non-critical), power generation, pulp & paper.

Triple Offset

High Cost. Reserved for critical services: high-pressure steam, cryogenic LNG, emergency shutdown (ESD), and severe chemical applications.

Need Help Selecting a Valve?

Our engineers are ready to assist with your application.

Request a Quote

Share:

Related news recommendations

loading